EMP · Sunday, October 18
Congress keeps using the phrase blackout warfare. The hardware has not caught up.
Defense bills now name electromagnetic attack alongside cyber and missiles. Substation yards look much as they did.
by: Andrew, Co-Founder at Blackout Briefing

Through the last defense-authorization cycle, lawmakers in both chambers have written electromagnetic vulnerability into the conversation about China, Russia, and “blackout warfare.” The phrase covers high-altitude nuclear pulses and, more loosely, other ways of denying power, communications, and satellites.
A phrase in a defense bill can put a subject in bounds. It can ask for assessments and for agencies to talk to each other. Readers who hear “blackout warfare” as a hardware program will look for equipment nobody has yet been told to buy. Naming China, Russia, and the electromagnetic threat in statute is not the same act as ordering a transformer.
A high-altitude burst can cover a huge footprint because the gamma rays and Compton electrons do their work in the upper atmosphere, not in a crater downtown. The grid underneath is still a mid-century machine with digital controls bolted on. Naming the threat in statute does not order a transformer.
The footprint is large because the work of the burst is done high up, over a wide area, rather than in a crater in a downtown. Under that footprint the machines that move power are still the older ones, with newer digital controls attached. Those controls made the system easier to operate. They also added parts that a fast field is good at confusing. Statute does not change either layer.
The measure of progress is boring: spare equipment staged by interconnection, procedures exercised against a space-weather alert, and a count of critical units that have been assessed for geomagnetically induced current. Speeches are not on that list.
The loose end of the phrase pulls in other ways of denying power, communications, and satellites. Those are different acts, with different buyers. One label keeps a hearing coherent and can leave procurement split. The machines that fail may coincide. The offices that can protect them do not, unless someone forces the list back down to equipment.
A unit that has not been assessed for geomagnetically induced current cannot be honestly placed in a spare plan. Spares staged by interconnection are replacements that exist on the right side of the system, not in a speech. Procedures exercised against a space-weather alert are steps someone has already tried. If those three do not move, the wording in the bill has not moved the grid.
Sources
- Congress Sounds Alarm Over EMP ‘Blackout Warfare’ Threat From China, Russia — Worthy Christian News · the article this brief was written from
- Electromagnetic Pulse and Geomagnetic Disturbance — Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
- Executive Order 13865 — Coordinating National Resilience to Electromagnetic Pulses — The American Presidency Project
- PRC State-Sponsored Actors Compromise U.S. Critical Infrastructure (AA24-038A) — CISA, NSA, and FBI
More in EMP
- The civilian grid is still the soft target in a high-altitude pulse
by: Andrew, Co-Founder at Blackout Briefing
- E1, E2, and E3 are not the same problem wearing three names
by: Andrew, Co-Founder at Blackout Briefing
- High-power microwaves are a battlefield tool. They are not a national blackout.
by: Andrew, Co-Founder at Blackout Briefing
Recent news
CME
A Carrington-class storm is a when, not a science-fiction ifby: Andrew, Co-Founder at Blackout Briefing
Grid
Metcalf still explains the grid better than most white papersby: Andrew, Co-Founder at Blackout Briefing
Survival
The first seventy-two hours are a sequence, not a vibeby: Andrew, Co-Founder at Blackout Briefing
