Monday, October 19, 2026

EMP · Saturday, October 17

High-power microwaves are a battlefield tool. They are not a national blackout.

Directed-energy systems shown at defense expos fry drones in a beam. A continental pulse is a different weapon.

by: Andrew, Co-Founder at Blackout Briefing

Vendors have spent the last several show seasons demonstrating high-power microwave systems meant to drop drone swarms by upsetting their electronics. The physics rhymes with EMP — a violent electromagnetic field, unprotected circuits — and then the similarity ends. These are aimed, short-range, line-of-sight weapons.

Aimed, short-range, and line of sight are the whole difference after the rhyme. Someone points the system. Distance and whatever stands in the way decide what it can reach. The design target in the demonstrations is a drone swarm in that beam. A city beyond the horizon is a different weapon, the high-altitude pulse, whose work is done over a continent rather than along a sightline.

Confusing them with a high-altitude nuclear pulse makes both problems harder to discuss. One is an air-defense magazine that does not run out of missiles. The other is a wide-area insult to civilian infrastructure. Policy that treats them as the same line item will buy the wrong hardware.

An air-defense tool that does not draw down a magazine of missiles is a battlefield argument. It assumes a power source, a target in view, and a military job. It does not, by existing, harden a transformer in another state. Buying more of the beam because a hearing used the word “pulse” leaves civilian infrastructure where it was.

What they share is a reminder: modern life is a stack of chips. Anything that can throw a violent field, even locally, is now a design constraint for bases, ports, and the grids that feed them.

The reverse confusion is available too. Dismissing a local electromagnetic weapon because it cannot black out a nation ignores bases, ports, and the electronics now sitting in the open. Wrong hardware runs both directions: continental talk for a beam problem, or a drone demonstrator billed as a grid program. The line item should say which machine it is for.

A stack of chips is a design constraint only at the range that constraint is real. A port can care about a violent field at the fence without a theory of the upper atmosphere. A transmission planner can care about the slow current in the lines without a trade-show drone. Match the protection to the insult you are actually buying against.

Sources

  1. Electromagnetic Pulse and Geomagnetic Disturbance — Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency · the article this brief was written from
  2. Executive Order 13865 — Coordinating National Resilience to Electromagnetic Pulses — The American Presidency Project
  3. Coordinating National Resilience to Electromagnetic Pulses — Federal Register

More in EMP

Recent news